Human Feedback Data

Expert feedback that improves reasoning, not just fluency.

Post-training pipelines need human signal from people who can evaluate whether a model's reasoning is actually correct — not just whether the output reads well. That requires domain expertise, not crowd consensus.

Mathematicians ranking mathematical reasoning. Engineers evaluating code logic. Linguists judging contextual accuracy. Every preference judgment backed by specialists matched to task complexity.

Capabilities

Feedback types

  • Preference Ranking
  • Reward Signal Generation
  • Reasoning Quality Judgment
  • Comparative Evaluation
  • Factuality Verification
  • Domain-Expert Feedback
  • Safety & Alignment Signals
  • Custom Evaluation Rubrics

Quality Assurance

Every delivery includes inter-annotator agreement scores, reasoning traces for each judgment, and a full QA report. Your reward model trains on verified signal, not noise.

Ready to start?

No commitment required.